Proposal:Key:oven

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
(Redirected from Proposed features/Key:oven)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The Feature Page for the approved proposal oven is located at Key:oven
A traditional pizza oven (wood_fired)
Key:oven
Proposal status: Approved (active)
Proposed by: Giardia
Tagging: oven=*
Applies to: node area
Definition: The oven tag is used to describe a type of an oven, e.g. inside a Pizzeria
Statistics:

Draft started: 2015-10-14
RFC start: 2015-10-14
Vote start: 2016-12-06
Vote end: 2016-12-20


Proposal

This is a tag that can be used as a property to specify the kind of oven a feature provides. E.g. it can be added to restaurants, fast foods, bakeries, etc. - to say whether they use an electric oven, a wood fired oven or other type of oven. It can also be added to provide the type of oven for amenity=baking_oven.

Rationale

To describe places selling prepared food (restaurants etc.), we currently have cuisine=* including the value cuisine=pizza, but to really determine the kind of pizza it would be nice to also tag the type of the oven they use to prepare it.

To map a stand-alone (public) oven for producing food, use amenity=baking_oven.

To map a stand-alone oven for smeltering and such, use man_made=kiln.-

Tagging

see taginfo ​https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/oven

Features/Pages affected

Comments

Please use the discussion page for discussion.

Voting

Instructions for voting
  • Log in to the wiki if you are not already logged in.
  • Scroll back down and click "Edit source" next to the title "Voting". Copy and paste the appropriate code from this table on its own line at the bottom of the text area:
To get this output you type Description
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal.
{{vote|yes}} --~~~~ Feel free to also explain why you support the proposal!
  • I oppose this proposal I oppose this proposal. reason
{{vote|no}} reason --~~~~ Replace reason with your reason(s) for voting no.
  • I abstain from voting but have comments I have comments but abstain from voting on this proposal. comments
{{vote|abstain}} comments --~~~~ If you don't want to vote yes or no but do have something to say. Replace comments with your comments.
Note: The ~~~~ automatically inserts your name and the current date.
For more types of votes you can cast, see Template:Vote. See also how vote outcome is processed.


  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --EneaSuper (talk) 09:46, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Yvanoé (talk) 11:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Meillo (talk) 11:23, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Dieterdreist (talk) 11:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Roadsguy (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Phoks (talk) 18:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Giardia (talk) 10:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Strehm (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Banze (talk) 19:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Scaro (talk) 20:24, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Waldhans (talk) 08:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Kazing (talk) 08:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Ac3filter (talk) 14:12, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Camey (talk) 09:42, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Jojo4u (talk) 23:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --RoGer6 (talk) 21:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Voting results

Voting closed

Voting on this proposal has been closed.

The result is accepted with 16 votes for.

More than required 74 % approval.