Related changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are in bold.
List of abbreviations:
- D
- Data item edit
- N
- This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
- m
- This is a minor edit
- b
- This edit was performed by a bot
- (±123)
- The page size changed by this number of bytes
13 March 2025
|
|
22:18 | Talk:Bicycle 7 changes history +6,538 [Yog Sot (2×); Mateusz Konieczny (5×)] | |||
|
|
22:18 (cur | prev) +925 Yog Sot talk contribs | ||||
|
|
17:50 (cur | prev) +270 Mateusz Konieczny talk contribs (→Controversial, disputable mapping is introduced without any discussion: :::"Two different intersections that look the same if one-lined is an unresolved mapping issue" - how this one would be resolved by mapping them as two lines? ~~~~) | ||||
|
|
17:49 (cur | prev) +524 Mateusz Konieczny talk contribs (→Controversial, disputable mapping is introduced without any discussion: :::"in english where people from different countries can't come to a clear agreement as well." - probably because starting post is utterly unclear ~~~~ :::"I did not give sources" - then maybe I will remove this entry from list of valid and accepted tagging styles and demand sources if you want to add it? ~~~~) | ||||
|
|
16:23 (cur | prev) +2,421 Yog Sot talk contribs (controversy) | ||||
|
|
09:49 (cur | prev) +267 Mateusz Konieczny talk contribs (→Controversial, disputable mapping is introduced without any discussion: :"This is not how contributions are passed down." what was wrong with it? Do you think that marking this variants as undesirable with strikeout was better? ~~~~) | ||||
|
|
09:48 (cur | prev) +111 Mateusz Konieczny talk contribs (→Controversial, disputable mapping is introduced without any discussion: ce) | ||||
|
|
09:47 (cur | prev) +2,020 Mateusz Konieczny talk contribs (→Controversial, disputable mapping is introduced without any discussion: :"there is a group of people who want to disallow other mappers precise tagging and mapping a separate cycleway or a sidewalk" - I am pretty sure that this mismatches actual situation where there is controversy about mapping cycleway and footway split by painted line as a separate objects, not about mapping separate cycleways or separate sidewalks at all. I am planning to revert https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.ph) | ||||
10 March 2025
| 21:05 | Talk:Bicycle diffhist +1,660 Yog Sot talk contribs (→Controversial, disputable mapping is introduced without any discussion: new section) | ||||