Proposal:Dry riser inlet
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Note: The
For full template documentation see Template:Vote. See also how vote outcome is processed.
 | The emergency=dry_riser_inlet tag is deprecated. See Proposal_features/Building_inlet for details. |
| Dry riser inlet | |
|---|---|
| Proposal status: | Approved (active) |
| Proposed by: | dieterdreist |
| Tagging: | emergency=dry_riser_inlet |
| Applies to: | node 
|
| Definition: | a point to which firefighters can connect a pressurized water source |
| Statistics: |
|
| Draft started: | 2017-03-09 |
| RFC start: | 2017-11-16 |
| Vote start: | 2017-12-01 |
| Vote end: | 2017-12-31 (extended) |
Proposal
The dry riser inlet or fire department connection (FDC) is a point to which firefighters can connect a pressurized water source. It's the endpoint of a dry riser, an empty tube to distribute water to various parts of a building or structure in case of a fire.
Rationale
There is a tag for the other endpoint, emergency=fire_hydrant in combination with fire_hydrant:type=wall but apparently none for the inlet.
Tagging
Add emergency=dry_riser_inlet for a dry riser inlet. Other useful tags include
- ref=*
- couplings:diameters=* (if you know it)
- couplings:type=* (the coupling standard, e.g. Bayonet, Barcelona, Guillemin, Klaue, Sprawny, Storz, UNI)
- couplings=* the number of couplings
For more details on possibly useful tags, see Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions_(part_2)
External Discussions
- On the german forum: [1]
- talk-it March 2017
Comments
Please comment on the discussion page.
Voting
Instructions for voting
- Log in to the wiki if you are not already logged in.
- Scroll down to voting and click 'Edit source'. Copy and paste the appropriate code from this table on its own line at the bottom of the text area:
| To get this output | you type | Description |
|---|---|---|
|
{{vote|yes}} --~~~~
|
Feel free to also explain why you support proposal. |
|
{{vote|no}} reason --~~~~
|
Replace reason with your reason(s) for voting no. |
|
{{vote|abstain}} comments --~~~~
|
If you don't want to vote but have comments. Replace comments with your comments. |
~~~~ automatically inserts your name and the current date.For full template documentation see Template:Vote. See also how vote outcome is processed.
I approve this proposal. --EneaSuper (talk) 10:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)- I approve this proposal. -- Cascafico (talk) 15:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. Bubix (talk) 08:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. Would be great to see on which geometry it applies to (I assume the new key is only valid on nodes) Fanfouer (talk) 11:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I would also assume nodes only, but in the end tags have to be applied to the objects they belong to, and this depends on the situation and is the competence of the mapper. —Dieterdreist (talk) 09:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. Marc CH (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Sirmmo (talk) 14:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)--
- I approve this proposal. Lorenzo_perone (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --GeoFrizz (talk) 16:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Pignolog (talk) 16:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Viking81 (talk) 22:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Robkoch (talk) 20:10, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. —Dieterdreist (talk) 09:01, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --MoritzM (talk) 11:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Michi (talk) 16:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
I oppose this proposal.--Gosausee Unnötig, weil zu ungenau. Welche Feuerwehr würde diese Daten verwenden? Das hat nichts mehr mit Landkarten zu tun.
- Interesting argument, who would use that. I have heart that about OSM in general. In 2004.
- +1, das hat wirklich nichts mehr mit Landkarten zu tun. —Dieterdreist (talk) 19:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Interesting argument, who would use that. I have heart that about OSM in general. In 2004.
- I approve this proposal. --Polarbear w (talk) 20:02, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Emergency99 (talk) 21:01, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. already tagged some ;) --Dakon (talk) 22:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Roman H (talk) 23:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --User 5359 (talk) 09:17, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --GuntherH (talk) 13:12, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Mueschel (talk) 14:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Uboot (talk) 10:36, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Luschi (talk) 17:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
22 YES, 1 NO, feature is approved