Proposal:Tag:natural=fiery fountain
(Redirected from Proposal:Proposal:Tag:natural=fiery fountain)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Tag:natural=fiery_fountain | |
|---|---|
| Proposal status: | Draft (under way) |
| Proposed by: | Gabrielesani |
| Tagging: | natural=fiery_fountain |
| Applies to: | 
|
| Definition: | Fiery fountains are natural springs of flammable gas (usually coming from below ground) and which flames are often self-sustained |
| Statistics: |
|
| Draft started: | 2024-03-19 |
| RFC start: | 2024-03-19 |
| Vote start: | 2024-10-14 |
| Vote end: | 2024-10-16 |
Proposal
A natural spring of flammable gas. The flame could be self-sustained or easily lightable. To be categorized as a fiery fountain the source must come naturally from the ground (no pipes or similar to transport the gas),
Rationale
There is currently no tag to represent this natural element.
Tagging
Applies to node only:
- natural=fiery_fountain
Examples
Comments
Please comment on the discussion page.
External discussions
- Community Forum [RFC] Feature Proposal - Tag:natural=fiery_fountain
- Community Forum [Voting] Feature Proposal - natural=fiery_fountain
Voting
Instructions for voting
- Log in to the wiki if you are not already logged in.
- Scroll down to voting and click 'Edit source'. Copy and paste the appropriate code from this table on its own line at the bottom of the text area:
| To get this output | you type | Description |
|---|---|---|
|
{{vote|yes}} --~~~~
|
Feel free to also explain why you support proposal. |
|
{{vote|no}} reason --~~~~
|
Replace reason with your reason(s) for voting no. |
|
{{vote|abstain}} comments --~~~~
|
If you don't want to vote but have comments. Replace comments with your comments. |
~~~~ automatically inserts your name and the current date.For full template documentation see Template:Vote. See also how vote outcome is processed.
I approve this proposal. --Jrachi (talk) 08:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
I oppose this proposal. I changed my vote to oppose. natural=eternal_flame would be much better as that is the existing English term as other pointed out below. I do think this phenomena should have a tag. Also, it would be good if the proposal solved how to tag those man_made eternal flames --Supsup (talk) 23:31, 14 October 2024 (UTC)- I approve this proposal. Since it's a missing feature it's reasonable to add it --Gabrielesani (talk) 09:54, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --AndresDuhour (talk) 11:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. I agree with Gabrielesani. --Dieterdreist (talk) 13:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. This term does not exist in English, and it's clearly silly to "vote" on something like this that only has two examples mapped. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/voting-feature-proposal-natural-fiery-fountain/120147/2 . "It makes no sense to vote" was also the feedback you got from https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-feature-proposal-tag-natural-fiery-fountain/110703 . SomeoneElse (talk) 16:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. There is an existing English word for a naturally occurring eternal flame, and going by various entries the flame is allowed to extinguish by itself from time to time, then be re-ignited by for example lightning : Eternal flame - Wikipedia - There are also man-made eternal flames, e.g. on various Unknown Soldier’s resting places, hence makes sense to include the Natural / Naturally_Occurring part. -- H4N5-antw {talk} 21:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. As others said "fiery fountain" is a phantasy term and did not get much support in the forum discussion about this issue. Map HeRo (talk)
- I approve this proposal. I don't know if there are better English words for this kind of objects ('eternal flames' can also be operated by humans), and I fear there will be not so many OSM elements with this tag, but I think this proposal makes sense for those who need to map those specific naturally occurring events --Marcor (talk) 17:43, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal.... but agree that it should be tagged! The proper term seems to be "eternal flame" and I think it should be used here. That "eternal flames" can also be man made is no problem in my opinion as it is a tag for the key natural=* which implies obviously that it's not man made. One could use man_made=eternal_flame (2 uses at the moment) and natural=eternal_flame for the different items. --Segubi (talk)
- I oppose this proposal. Eternal flame sounds better Rtnf (talk) 05:41, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Results
The voting was abandoned in favour of modifying the proposal to use an actual English word