Proposal talk:Service=parking aisle

Comments

• Should service=ally be service=alley? Perhaps it's intentional or an Anglocism? sadam 22:28, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

• yes --Nickvet419 22:42, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Results from Proposed features/parking aisle

Voting from Proposed features/parking aisle

• I approve this proposal.--Nickvet419 05:11, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
• I oppose this proposal. It's a Rendering issue. Use highway=service service=parking_aisle and let's expand the Osmarender/Mapnik-Styles --Cbm 05:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
• I oppose this proposal. - I second Cbm here. --Tessarakt2 06:54, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
• I oppose this proposal. - highway=service is appropriate and sufficient here; don't change the tagging scheme to work around rendering issues. -- Eugene van der Pijll 07:23, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
• I oppose this proposal. I agree with Cbm -- Ulfl 07:32, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
• I oppose this proposal. I agree with Cbm -- Hyrava 13:48, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
• I oppose this proposal. I also prefer the solution of Cbm which does not add a new value in the long list of highway keys-- Pieren 14:23, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
• I oppose this proposal. I agree with Cbm --SlowRider 17:29, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
• I oppose this proposal. I agree with Cbm --Etric Celine 17:46, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
• I oppose this proposal. I agree with Cbm --Cartinus 20:50, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
• I oppose this proposal. As per above. --Thomas Wood 01:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

This proposal has been Rejected

Alternate solution from Talk:Proposed features/parking aisle

highway=service service=parking_aisle With that methode there is much more flexibility without creating several new highway-parameters. --Cbm 05:25, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

• Sounds good and not drawing these on lower zooms seems doable. service=* is used with railway=* but a railway siding or spur on the same way as a parking aisle seems unlikely and if such a place exists, they can be drawn separately with minimal separation or the same nodes. Alv 11:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)