Examine individual changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page allows you to examine the variables generated by the Abuse Filter for an individual change.
Variables generated for this change
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
Edit count of the user (user_editcount) | 876 |
Name of the user account (user_name) | 'Kylenz' |
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile) | false |
Page ID (page_id) | 324669 |
Page namespace (page_namespace) | 3001 |
Page title (without namespace) (page_title) | 'Culvert type' |
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle) | 'Proposal talk:Culvert type' |
Action (action) | 'edit' |
Edit summary/reason (summary) | 'reply to /* arch */' |
Old content model (old_content_model) | 'wikitext' |
New content model (new_content_model) | 'wikitext' |
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext) | '== arch ==
[[File:2018 LDMK Tiefenbachdurchlass 02.jpg|150px]] my proposal: {{Tag|culvert|arch}} (similar to {{Tag|bridge:structure|arch}}) --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 06:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
: [[File:Culvert_And_Stream_Underpass_In_Freimersheim.jpg|150px]] Hey {{Ping|HeiKue}}, how would you distinguish {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} from your proposed {{Tag|culvert|arch}}? They look very similar to me --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 08:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
:: Hello {{Ping|Kylenz}}, it's also OK for me to add ''oval'' and ''arch'' to the {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} definition. At the moment it states only ''semicircle''.
:: What is the [[Tag_status#Status_values|Tag_status]] of {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}}?
:: I'm currently working on the historical [[wikipedia:Ludwig Canal]]. Here are pictures of it's oval/arch culverts: [[wikipedia:de:Benutzer:Derzno/Ludwigskanal#Durchlass]] --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 10:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
::: {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} is just ''proposed'', and your suggestion is the first one for this 3-year-old proposal :) {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}} is only used 1 time, but {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} is used 11 times. So maybe we should just replace {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}} in {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} the proposal? I don't have a strong opinion about what the best name is --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 10:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
:::: I am not a hydraulic engineering expert and so I googled for [https://www.google.com/search?q=culvert+shapes culvert shapes]. ''half pipe'' seems to be a unusual type/wording. ''arch'' is usual and would be the better term.
:::: How to ''refresh'' this proposal? Were there discussions elsewhere (forum)? --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 11:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
==Not only culverts==
Hello
I support any initiative to describe structures of tunnels and culverts. We need better ontology to do so. However here, proposed structures aren't specific to culverts, they are independently suitable for {{tag|tunnel|flooded}} as well. This we had better to choose a more general key to state the shape of any duct, not only culverts hadn't we? [[User:Fanfouer|Fanfouer]] ([[User talk:Fanfouer|talk]]) 11:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)' |
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext) | '== arch ==
[[File:2018 LDMK Tiefenbachdurchlass 02.jpg|150px]] my proposal: {{Tag|culvert|arch}} (similar to {{Tag|bridge:structure|arch}}) --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 06:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
: [[File:Culvert_And_Stream_Underpass_In_Freimersheim.jpg|150px]] Hey {{Ping|HeiKue}}, how would you distinguish {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} from your proposed {{Tag|culvert|arch}}? They look very similar to me --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 08:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
:: Hello {{Ping|Kylenz}}, it's also OK for me to add ''oval'' and ''arch'' to the {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} definition. At the moment it states only ''semicircle''.
:: What is the [[Tag_status#Status_values|Tag_status]] of {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}}?
:: I'm currently working on the historical [[wikipedia:Ludwig Canal]]. Here are pictures of it's oval/arch culverts: [[wikipedia:de:Benutzer:Derzno/Ludwigskanal#Durchlass]] --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 10:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
::: {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} is just ''proposed'', and your suggestion is the first one for this 3-year-old proposal :) {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}} is only used 1 time, but {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} is used 11 times. So maybe we should just replace {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}} in {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} the proposal? I don't have a strong opinion about what the best name is --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 10:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
:::: I am not a hydraulic engineering expert and so I googled for [https://www.google.com/search?q=culvert+shapes culvert shapes]. ''half pipe'' seems to be a unusual type/wording. ''arch'' is usual and would be the better term.
:::: How to ''refresh'' this proposal? Were there discussions elsewhere (forum)? --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 11:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
::::: Sounds good, I've updated the proposal to use {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} instead of {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}}. The forum didn't exist in 2021, I'll make a post now. It seems like I forgot to send this proposal to the old mailing list, which is probably why no one commented until today 😆 --~~~~' |
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff) | '@@ -14,5 +14,3 @@
:::: How to ''refresh'' this proposal? Were there discussions elsewhere (forum)? --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 11:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
-==Not only culverts==
-Hello
-I support any initiative to describe structures of tunnels and culverts. We need better ontology to do so. However here, proposed structures aren't specific to culverts, they are independently suitable for {{tag|tunnel|flooded}} as well. This we had better to choose a more general key to state the shape of any duct, not only culverts hadn't we? [[User:Fanfouer|Fanfouer]] ([[User talk:Fanfouer|talk]]) 11:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
+::::: Sounds good, I've updated the proposal to use {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} instead of {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}}. The forum didn't exist in 2021, I'll make a post now. It seems like I forgot to send this proposal to the old mailing list, which is probably why no one commented until today 😆 --~~~~
' |
Unified diff of changes made by edit, pre-save transformed (edit_diff_pst) | '@@ -14,5 +14,3 @@
:::: How to ''refresh'' this proposal? Were there discussions elsewhere (forum)? --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 11:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
-==Not only culverts==
-Hello
-I support any initiative to describe structures of tunnels and culverts. We need better ontology to do so. However here, proposed structures aren't specific to culverts, they are independently suitable for {{tag|tunnel|flooded}} as well. This we had better to choose a more general key to state the shape of any duct, not only culverts hadn't we? [[User:Fanfouer|Fanfouer]] ([[User talk:Fanfouer|talk]]) 11:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
+::::: Sounds good, I've updated the proposal to use {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} instead of {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}}. The forum didn't exist in 2021, I'll make a post now. It seems like I forgot to send this proposal to the old mailing list, which is probably why no one commented until today 😆 --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 11:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
' |
Lines added in edit (added_lines) | [
0 => '::::: Sounds good, I've updated the proposal to use {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} instead of {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}}. The forum didn't exist in 2021, I'll make a post now. It seems like I forgot to send this proposal to the old mailing list, which is probably why no one commented until today 😆 --~~~~'
] |
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines) | [
0 => '==Not only culverts==',
1 => 'Hello',
2 => 'I support any initiative to describe structures of tunnels and culverts. We need better ontology to do so. However here, proposed structures aren't specific to culverts, they are independently suitable for {{tag|tunnel|flooded}} as well. This we had better to choose a more general key to state the shape of any duct, not only culverts hadn't we? [[User:Fanfouer|Fanfouer]] ([[User talk:Fanfouer|talk]]) 11:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)'
] |
Lines added in edit, pre-save transformed (added_lines_pst) | [
0 => '::::: Sounds good, I've updated the proposal to use {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} instead of {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}}. The forum didn't exist in 2021, I'll make a post now. It seems like I forgot to send this proposal to the old mailing list, which is probably why no one commented until today 😆 --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 11:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)'
] |
New page wikitext, pre-save transformed (new_pst) | '== arch ==
[[File:2018 LDMK Tiefenbachdurchlass 02.jpg|150px]] my proposal: {{Tag|culvert|arch}} (similar to {{Tag|bridge:structure|arch}}) --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 06:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
: [[File:Culvert_And_Stream_Underpass_In_Freimersheim.jpg|150px]] Hey {{Ping|HeiKue}}, how would you distinguish {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} from your proposed {{Tag|culvert|arch}}? They look very similar to me --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 08:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
:: Hello {{Ping|Kylenz}}, it's also OK for me to add ''oval'' and ''arch'' to the {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} definition. At the moment it states only ''semicircle''.
:: What is the [[Tag_status#Status_values|Tag_status]] of {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}}?
:: I'm currently working on the historical [[wikipedia:Ludwig Canal]]. Here are pictures of it's oval/arch culverts: [[wikipedia:de:Benutzer:Derzno/Ludwigskanal#Durchlass]] --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 10:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
::: {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} is just ''proposed'', and your suggestion is the first one for this 3-year-old proposal :) {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}} is only used 1 time, but {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} is used 11 times. So maybe we should just replace {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}} in {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} the proposal? I don't have a strong opinion about what the best name is --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 10:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
:::: I am not a hydraulic engineering expert and so I googled for [https://www.google.com/search?q=culvert+shapes culvert shapes]. ''half pipe'' seems to be a unusual type/wording. ''arch'' is usual and would be the better term.
:::: How to ''refresh'' this proposal? Were there discussions elsewhere (forum)? --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 11:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
::::: Sounds good, I've updated the proposal to use {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} instead of {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}}. The forum didn't exist in 2021, I'll make a post now. It seems like I forgot to send this proposal to the old mailing list, which is probably why no one commented until today 😆 --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 11:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)' |
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp) | '1736509694' |