| Variable | Value |
|---|
Edit count of the user (user_editcount) | 876 |
Name of the user account (user_name) | 'Kylenz' |
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile) | false |
Page ID (page_id) | 324669 |
Page namespace (page_namespace) | 3001 |
Page title (without namespace) (page_title) | 'Culvert type' |
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle) | 'Proposal talk:Culvert type' |
Action (action) | 'edit' |
Edit summary/reason (summary) | 'reply to /* arch */' |
Old content model (old_content_model) | 'wikitext' |
New content model (new_content_model) | 'wikitext' |
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext) | '== arch ==
[[File:2018 LDMK Tiefenbachdurchlass 02.jpg|150px]] my proposal: {{Tag|culvert|arch}} (similar to {{Tag|bridge:structure|arch}}) --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 06:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
: [[File:Culvert_And_Stream_Underpass_In_Freimersheim.jpg|150px]] Hey {{Ping|HeiKue}}, how would you distinguish {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} from your proposed {{Tag|culvert|arch}}? They look very similar to me --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 08:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
:: Hello {{Ping|Kylenz}}, it's also OK for me to add ''oval'' and ''arch'' to the {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} definition. At the moment it states only ''semicircle''.
:: What is the [[Tag_status#Status_values|Tag_status]] of {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}}?
:: I'm currently working on the historical [[wikipedia:Ludwig Canal]]. Here are pictures of it's oval/arch culverts: [[wikipedia:de:Benutzer:Derzno/Ludwigskanal#Durchlass]] --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 10:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
::: {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} is just ''proposed'', and your suggestion is the first one for this 3-year-old proposal :) {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}} is only used 1 time, but {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} is used 11 times. So maybe we should just replace {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}} in {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} the proposal? I don't have a strong opinion about what the best name is --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 10:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
:::: I am not a hydraulic engineering expert and so I googled for [https://www.google.com/search?q=culvert+shapes culvert shapes]. ''half pipe'' seems to be a unusual type/wording. ''arch'' is usual and would be the better term.
:::: How to ''refresh'' this proposal? Were there discussions elsewhere (forum)? --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 11:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
==Not only culverts==
Hello
I support any initiative to describe structures of tunnels and culverts. We need better ontology to do so. However here, proposed structures aren't specific to culverts, they are independently suitable for {{tag|tunnel|flooded}} as well. This we had better to choose a more general key to state the shape of any duct, not only culverts hadn't we? [[User:Fanfouer|Fanfouer]] ([[User talk:Fanfouer|talk]]) 11:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)' |
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext) | '== arch ==
[[File:2018 LDMK Tiefenbachdurchlass 02.jpg|150px]] my proposal: {{Tag|culvert|arch}} (similar to {{Tag|bridge:structure|arch}}) --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 06:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
: [[File:Culvert_And_Stream_Underpass_In_Freimersheim.jpg|150px]] Hey {{Ping|HeiKue}}, how would you distinguish {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} from your proposed {{Tag|culvert|arch}}? They look very similar to me --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 08:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
:: Hello {{Ping|Kylenz}}, it's also OK for me to add ''oval'' and ''arch'' to the {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} definition. At the moment it states only ''semicircle''.
:: What is the [[Tag_status#Status_values|Tag_status]] of {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}}?
:: I'm currently working on the historical [[wikipedia:Ludwig Canal]]. Here are pictures of it's oval/arch culverts: [[wikipedia:de:Benutzer:Derzno/Ludwigskanal#Durchlass]] --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 10:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
::: {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} is just ''proposed'', and your suggestion is the first one for this 3-year-old proposal :) {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}} is only used 1 time, but {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} is used 11 times. So maybe we should just replace {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}} in {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} the proposal? I don't have a strong opinion about what the best name is --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 10:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
:::: I am not a hydraulic engineering expert and so I googled for [https://www.google.com/search?q=culvert+shapes culvert shapes]. ''half pipe'' seems to be a unusual type/wording. ''arch'' is usual and would be the better term.
:::: How to ''refresh'' this proposal? Were there discussions elsewhere (forum)? --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 11:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
::::: Sounds good, I've updated the proposal to use {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} instead of {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}}. The forum didn't exist in 2021, I'll make a post now. It seems like I forgot to send this proposal to the old mailing list, which is probably why no one commented until today 🤦 --~~~~' |
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff) | '@@ -14,5 +14,3 @@
:::: How to ''refresh'' this proposal? Were there discussions elsewhere (forum)? --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 11:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
-==Not only culverts==
-Hello
-I support any initiative to describe structures of tunnels and culverts. We need better ontology to do so. However here, proposed structures aren't specific to culverts, they are independently suitable for {{tag|tunnel|flooded}} as well. This we had better to choose a more general key to state the shape of any duct, not only culverts hadn't we? [[User:Fanfouer|Fanfouer]] ([[User talk:Fanfouer|talk]]) 11:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
+::::: Sounds good, I've updated the proposal to use {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} instead of {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}}. The forum didn't exist in 2021, I'll make a post now. It seems like I forgot to send this proposal to the old mailing list, which is probably why no one commented until today 🤦 --~~~~
' |
Unified diff of changes made by edit, pre-save transformed (edit_diff_pst) | '@@ -14,5 +14,3 @@
:::: How to ''refresh'' this proposal? Were there discussions elsewhere (forum)? --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 11:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
-==Not only culverts==
-Hello
-I support any initiative to describe structures of tunnels and culverts. We need better ontology to do so. However here, proposed structures aren't specific to culverts, they are independently suitable for {{tag|tunnel|flooded}} as well. This we had better to choose a more general key to state the shape of any duct, not only culverts hadn't we? [[User:Fanfouer|Fanfouer]] ([[User talk:Fanfouer|talk]]) 11:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
+::::: Sounds good, I've updated the proposal to use {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} instead of {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}}. The forum didn't exist in 2021, I'll make a post now. It seems like I forgot to send this proposal to the old mailing list, which is probably why no one commented until today 🤦 --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 11:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
' |
Lines added in edit (added_lines) | [
0 => '::::: Sounds good, I've updated the proposal to use {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} instead of {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}}. The forum didn't exist in 2021, I'll make a post now. It seems like I forgot to send this proposal to the old mailing list, which is probably why no one commented until today 🤦 --~~~~'
] |
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines) | [
0 => '==Not only culverts==',
1 => 'Hello',
2 => 'I support any initiative to describe structures of tunnels and culverts. We need better ontology to do so. However here, proposed structures aren't specific to culverts, they are independently suitable for {{tag|tunnel|flooded}} as well. This we had better to choose a more general key to state the shape of any duct, not only culverts hadn't we? [[User:Fanfouer|Fanfouer]] ([[User talk:Fanfouer|talk]]) 11:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)'
] |
Lines added in edit, pre-save transformed (added_lines_pst) | [
0 => '::::: Sounds good, I've updated the proposal to use {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} instead of {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}}. The forum didn't exist in 2021, I'll make a post now. It seems like I forgot to send this proposal to the old mailing list, which is probably why no one commented until today 🤦 --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 11:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)'
] |
New page wikitext, pre-save transformed (new_pst) | '== arch ==
[[File:2018 LDMK Tiefenbachdurchlass 02.jpg|150px]] my proposal: {{Tag|culvert|arch}} (similar to {{Tag|bridge:structure|arch}}) --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 06:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
: [[File:Culvert_And_Stream_Underpass_In_Freimersheim.jpg|150px]] Hey {{Ping|HeiKue}}, how would you distinguish {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} from your proposed {{Tag|culvert|arch}}? They look very similar to me --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 08:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
:: Hello {{Ping|Kylenz}}, it's also OK for me to add ''oval'' and ''arch'' to the {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} definition. At the moment it states only ''semicircle''.
:: What is the [[Tag_status#Status_values|Tag_status]] of {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}}?
:: I'm currently working on the historical [[wikipedia:Ludwig Canal]]. Here are pictures of it's oval/arch culverts: [[wikipedia:de:Benutzer:Derzno/Ludwigskanal#Durchlass]] --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 10:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
::: {{Tag|culvert|half_pipe}} is just ''proposed'', and your suggestion is the first one for this 3-year-old proposal :) {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}} is only used 1 time, but {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} is used 11 times. So maybe we should just replace {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}} in {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} the proposal? I don't have a strong opinion about what the best name is --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 10:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
:::: I am not a hydraulic engineering expert and so I googled for [https://www.google.com/search?q=culvert+shapes culvert shapes]. ''half pipe'' seems to be a unusual type/wording. ''arch'' is usual and would be the better term.
:::: How to ''refresh'' this proposal? Were there discussions elsewhere (forum)? --[[User:HeiKue|HeiKue]] ([[User talk:HeiKue|talk]]) 11:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
::::: Sounds good, I've updated the proposal to use {{TagValue|culvert|arch}} instead of {{TagValue|culvert|half_pipe}}. The forum didn't exist in 2021, I'll make a post now. It seems like I forgot to send this proposal to the old mailing list, which is probably why no one commented until today 🤦 --[[User:Kylenz|Kylenz]] 11:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)' |
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp) | '1736509609' |