Talk:Key:foot:backward
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Reasons against oneway:bicycle
> proponents of this tag dislike it (for a reasoning that a subtag should not contradict the main tag).
That seems like a rather silly reason considering the whole purpose of oneway:*=* is to specify oneway=* in greater detail. By this reasoning, the popular oneway=yes + oneway:bicycle=no would also 'contradict the main tag'. Woazboat (talk) 22:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- No, oneway:bicycle would not contradict but override the generic oneway tag. As a bicycle is a vehicle, there is no contradiction but a refinement, greater detail as you put it. But pedestrians aren’t vehicles, so adding oneway:foot is not a refinement because oneway doesn’t imply anything for pedestrians. —Dieterdreist (talk) 23:04, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Interested parties should follow and participate in discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/effect-of-oneway-on-pedestrians/7631 --mnalis (talk) 23:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- No, oneway:bicycle would not contradict but override the generic oneway tag. As a bicycle is a vehicle, there is no contradiction but a refinement, greater detail as you put it. But pedestrians aren’t vehicles, so adding oneway:foot is not a refinement because oneway doesn’t imply anything for pedestrians. —Dieterdreist (talk) 23:04, 31 July 2024 (UTC)