Talk:Tag:bridge=covered

Unnecessary?

What's the difference between bridge=covered and bridge=yes + covered=yes (or something else like tunnel=yes) --Jgpacker (talk) 17:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

In principle it is the same, but the new way is bridge=covered see Proposed_features/Bridge_types.You find it also in JOSM --geozeisig (talk) 05:08, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Shouldn't the last 4 examples be `covered=yes` instead?

They only have a roof and some railings.

--Kovposch (talk) 17:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

This does not work well on several levels

We cannot have orthogonal properties to be used for defining bridge types, this tag pretends to imply a truss structure but it is not likely this is always the case because it is not self evident from the tag words. Any kind of bridge can be covered with a roof. —Dieterdreist (talk) 10:05, 22 December 2024 (UTC)