User talk:Discostu36

Attribution

Hello! And sorry for bothering you, but description of file you uploaded need to be improved.

You have uploaded file which is licensed as requiring attribution. But right now attribution is not specified properly.

Please, ask for help if something is confusing or unclear in this message.

Please, fix that problem with this uploads - note that images with unclear licensing situation may be deleted.

Attribution may be missing completely or just be specified in nonstandard way, in either case it needs to be improved. Note that using CC-BY files without specifying attribution is a copyright violation, which is often unethical and unwanted. So clearly specifying required attribution is needed if license which makes attribution mandatory was used.

If it is applying to your own work which not based on work by others - then you can select own user name or some other preferred attribution or even change license to for example {{CC0-self}}

For your own work: ensure that it is clearly stated at file page that you created image/took the photo/etc

For works by others - please ensure that there is link to the original source which confirms license and that you used proper attribution, or that source is clearly stated in some other way.

Especially for old OSM-baded maps, made from data before license change on 12 September 2012 you should use "map data © OpenStreetMap contributors" as at least part of attribution

For old OSM Carto maps, which predate license change on 12 September 2012 you can use a special template {{OSM Carto screenshot||old_license}}

• File:Babykarte30.png

Some editors use ...

Hi, regarding your edit Special:Diff/2411595:

Please clarify do you mean software editors (in which case please elaborate which editors) or do you mean contributors (in which case please use "mappers" instead for more clarity). --Push-f (talk) 15:11, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll.change it into "mappers". Discostu36 (talk) 15:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Why did you remove my vote?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/2416709 Something B (talk) 10:18, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

I am sorry, Wiki editing on mobile is really not convenient. Discostu36 (talk) 10:37, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Please be careful. Thank you! Something B (talk) 10:42, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

cycleway:left/right:separate

Wozu soll die Seitenangabe gut sein? Also wer braucht das, sofern nicht nur einer von zwei Radwegen separat ist? --Langläufer (talk) 19:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

"Wer braucht das" finde ich in OSM immer eine komische Frage, wir erfassen ja viele Dinge ohne zu wissen, wie viel sie ausgewertet werden. Aber wenn z.B. mal jemand herausfinden will, wie viel Prozent der benutzungspflichtigen Radwege beidseitig freigegebene Wege an einer Seite der Straße sind, dann wäre das so z.B. möglich. Discostu36 (talk) 19:43, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Finde ich nicht - ich erfasse nichts von dem sich mir nicht der Sinn erschließst. Aber das kann ja jeder so machen wie er möchte.

Also du meinst sowas wie bicycle=use_sidepath und cycleway:left=separate zeigt dir an, dass es einen benutzungspflichtigen Radweg für beide Fahrtrichtungen auf nur einer Straßenseite gibt. Ja, das könnte funktionieren. --Langläufer (talk) 19:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)