User talk:GaM

Edit warring

You consistently keep removing a page on bicycle:practical without discussing this with other. Please stop it. SK53 (talk) 14:26, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

I am owner of this old page. Tag not used in OSM db now. Only I used it at 2013-2016 year... ? AND I TALK with it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Andrewsh

This is a wiki, no one owns any pages outside their own userspace, they are a communal resource. Any pages in "tags:" "keys:" etc must be regarded as general pages. Also documentation of keys in actual use should be preserved. I have no objections to something like a deprecated header with your explanation "Experience shows that this tag is too subjective and actual objective criteria such as …. can achieve the same goals, and additionally allow for different types of cyclist and/or cycling proficiency" (this latter point was brought up on IRC, and I don't think you mentioned it). User:Andrewsh is just as culpable for edit warring BTW. I presume you have also removed most of the existing tags because taginfo thinks there are 750 and I can only find 21. SK53 (talk) 14:49, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

:: Tag info is not true source... 95% of uses it tag - author = ME. Its not USED. =)

:: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548755934/history was not added by you, but you removed it. If you want to remove the tag entirely (technically I agree with removing it) might have been better to first discuss that with affected users. --Wulf4096 (talk) 15:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

This is a wiki, pages have no owners. In cases of disagreement - please discuss it, preferably at the talk page at Talk:Key:bicycle:practical Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:54, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Image info

Are you author of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Gam-nevsky.jpg photo?

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|GaM}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)