User talk:Namo - Mobil im Alter

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Lizenzen

Es wäre schön, wenn du bei Bilduploads die Lizenzierung korrekt angeben könntest. Beispielsweise bei File:Untersuchungsraum_Bornheim.png fehlt sie (für die Daten und augenscheinlich auch für die verwendete Karte. www.openstreetmap.org/copyright stellt die Lizenzanforderungen dar. Wenn du Fragen hast, dann antworte einfach hier. Übrigens, zum Beispielbild: Es heißt "OpenStreetMap" – ohne "s". :-)

Bei File:Breite der Straßenquerung.png beispielsweise wäre es schön, wenn du die vom Fotograf erteilte freie Lizenz angeben könntest. Oder ist das Foto nicht frei lizenziert? Dann gib bitte auch das an — wobei wir eigentlich nur freie Inhalte hier haben wollen.

Übrigens: unter Special:ListFiles/Namo_-_Mobil_im_Alter findest du alle deine Bilder.

Viele Grüße --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 13:53, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Super, danke schön! Bei File:Untersuchungsraum Bornheim.png und File:Untersuchungsraum Bad Nauheim.png habe ich noch eine kleine Ergänzung gemacht, damit klarer ist, dass ihr auch noch was daran bearbeitet habt.
Bei File:Gehwegkanten aktuell.JPG und File:Gehwegkanten namo.JPG stimmt die Lizenz allerdings nicht. Denn dort werden zusätzlich Luftbilder gezeigt, für die die Lizenz nicht gilt (strenggenommen dürfen wir die Luftbilder eigentlich nur im Editor verwenden – siehe bing – wir tolerieren hier im Wiki aber zur Zeit solche Screenshots bzw. hoffen, dass bing nicht böse ist, wenn wir sie zur Dokumentation verwenden). Ich habe es jeweils korrigiert. Viele Grüße --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 12:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Verkehrszeichen

Ich habe File:Gemeinsame Nutzung des Weges.png zum Löschen markiert, weil es ein Duplikat eines bereits bestehenden Bildes (in besserer Qualität) ist. Wenn du Verkehrszeichen zur Illustration brauchst, dann schau auf z.B. DE:Road signs in Germany, so musst du auch nicht extra neu hochladen. Viele Grüße --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 13:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the author of image File:Beleuchtung an.png ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified January 2022}} from the file page.

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the creator of image File:Neigung Gefälle.png ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".

Doing this would be already very useful.

Licensing - photos

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Namo - Mobil im Alter}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, August}} from the file page.

Licensing - other images

If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.

See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.

note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.

note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.

Help

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.

(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 06:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Namo_-_Mobil_im_Alter&oldid=2383289"