User talk:Oivo357

Wikipedia links in the definition

Please do not add wikipedia links in the definition. They are not under our control, and are not describing the OSM feature, they are about similar concepts. It fine to add them to a "see also" section. The definition should be self sufficient and not depend on external links. I am specifically referring to your addition of "aqueduct(Bridge)" to the historic=aqueduct page. This is a good example how the wikipedia article does not fit. An aqueduct is about a structure that conveys water, it does not have to be a bridge or on a bridge, although bridges may be part of it, they are not a requirement. --Dieterdreist (talk) 12:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)