User talk:S-s-s wiki
Всем привет! Я готов к обсуждению \ Hello! I am ready to discussion.--s-s-s 21:42, 5 July 2011 (BST)
- Вы хотите поговорить об этом? —Dr&mx 14:08, 29 June 2011 (BST)
- :) Кстати , нужно ли добавлять свой ник --s-s-s 21:42, 5 July 2011 (BST) к своей реплике в обсуждениях или это делает автомат?
- нужно. Есть два способа. Ручной — пишите подряд четыре тильды (~). Автоматический — над окном редактирования жмете кнопку подпись. И там где курсор они появятся. Dr&mx 15:07, 29 June 2011 (BST)
- Понял, спасибо.--s-s-s 15:11, 29 June 2011 (BST)
- не за что. А вообще все обсуждения легче в форуме вести. forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21 Dr&mx 15:31, 29 June 2011 (BST)
- нужно. Есть два способа. Ручной — пишите подряд четыре тильды (~). Автоматический — над окном редактирования жмете кнопку подпись. И там где курсор они появятся. Dr&mx 15:07, 29 June 2011 (BST)
- :) Кстати , нужно ли добавлять свой ник --s-s-s 21:42, 5 July 2011 (BST) к своей реплике в обсуждениях или это делает автомат?
ссылки внутри вики
Привет, в статье Osm2mp ссылку на страницу FreeBSD легче и лучше писать как название страницы в двойных квадратных скобках. Как я это тут сделал :) Dr&mx 13:35, 30 June 2011 (BST)
- Да, уже отредактировал. :) Вы уже второй по этому поводу :). Хотя стиль обозначения внешних ссылок лучше бросается в глаза, имхо. Уже посещенная внутренняя ссылка в браузере часто сливается с текстом... --s-s-s 13:45, 30 June 2011 (BST)
Это смотря какой стиль включён. У меня они ни разу не сливается. Плюс стиль по-умолчанию может изменится, а мы на века пишем :) Dr&mx 14:18, 30 June 2011 (BST)
Xxzme
User:Xxzme has been blocked from the Wiki for 3 months --AndiG88 (talk) 11:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:BlockList?wpTarget=Xxzme
Ubuntu tutorial
Hi,
I wonder if you could do a Ubuntu 14.04 version of Creating a local OSM server. Thank you in advance. --Amaroussi (talk) 00:04, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- I do not have a Ubuntu on my servers. And the source code and API now is quite another.
Even if you will doing this for freebsd today, it will be an entirely new work. Sorry. --s-s-s (talk) 09:56, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Go ge
re https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Tigerfell#File:Go_ge.jpg
Note that File:Go ge 3d.jpg with 3D-View of Google Earth is problematic for copyright reasons, and it likely can and should be replaced by some alternative, unless GpsPrune documentation really needs Google Earth illustration
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Wiki#Designing_policy_for_handling_files_without_clear_license where it is being discussed on which rules such files can be kept
Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the author of image File:Go.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified March 2022}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2022 (UTC)