User talk:The knife

Beau boulot sur les transports, merci du coup de main ! Alexandre 08:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Split

Merci pour ton ajout sur la mémoire allouée au script (j'ai un peu oublié qu'il existait, ce script, d'ailleurs ;) )

Vincent 95 (talk) 12:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Les 2 bookmarklets = awesome !

Merci et super bonne idée pour les deux bookmarklets. Ça a l'air de fonctionner nickel chez moi. Au passage, je me demandais l'autre jour si yavait pas moyen de forcer par la barre d'url sur google map en mode earth3D, l'inclinaison et le field of view de la caméra. Te serais-tu déjà penché dessus par hasard ? (je pose ça car tu a l'air d'avoir un peu étudié la question dans un des paragraphes d'explication du bookmarklet. --Thaïti Bob (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Merci pour ce retour ! Pour ta question, a priori c'est possible, puisque l'url change quand on fait tourner la caméra 3D. Mais je ne me suis pas penché sur les valeurs des paramètres. --The knife (talk) 15:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for all your works on bookmarklets!

I created a few new ones based on your work. Thanks for sharing :)--PangoSE (talk) 11:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Baliser les magasins comme des points isolés

Bonjour,

Je viens poursuivre la discussion : iD affiche un avertissement quand un magasin (shop) est un point délimitant une surface. C’est pourquoi j’avais séparé quelques magasins. Saurais-tu d’où viennent ces avertissements affichés dans iD ? Est-ce propre à iD ou bien sont-ils affichés dans d’autres éditeurs ?

• Les corriger amène à incrémenter la clé resolved:mismatched_geometry:point_as_vertex dans le jeu de modifications.
• Je pensais qu’il s’agissait d’une contrainte dans la base de données, mais ce n’est apparamment pas le cas.

Bref, je cherche à savoir d’où vient cette recommandation pour qu’elle soit corrigée si ce n’est pas l’usage, sinon on n’a pas fini d’annuler ce genre de changements… --Pols12 (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the author of image File:Bati54 20150428.jpg ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified January 2022}} from the file page.

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)