Proposal:Lgbtq:unmarked tag
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Key:lgbtq=unmarked | |
|---|---|
| Proposal status: | Abandoned (inactive) |
| Proposed by: | jan-leila |
| Tagging: | lgbtq=unmarked |
| Applies to: | |
| Definition: | a way of marking public space has no indication of support for the lgbtq community |
| Statistics: |
|
| Draft started: | 2024-02-28 |
| RFC start: | 2024-02-29 |
Proposal
adding a "unmarked" option to the lgbtq tag
Rationale
Right now there is not a way to mark a location in a neutral manner to say that this location does not state a viewpoint on the lgbt community and its difficult to separate out places that have not been mapped from places that simply do not have a posted value.
Tagging
| Tag | Description |
|---|---|
| no (already exists) | lgbtq people are explicitly banned in a space |
| unmarked | space give no indication that they make efforts to respect people in the lgbtq community |
| welcome (already exists) | lgbtq people are explicitly allowed in a space |
primary (already exists)
|
lgbtq people are the target audience for a space |
only (already exists)
|
lgbtp people are the only people allowed in a space |
Examples
Any public building, or poi that does not explicitly have marking indicating if its welcoming to lgbtq people could be tagged with this
Rendering
No rendering changes would be needed
Features/Pages affected
Key:lgbtq would have a new section added to it
External discussions
https://discordapp.com/channels/413070382636072960/790139356903505951/1212656086881148928
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-feature-proposal-lgbtq-unmarked-tag/109893/3
Comments
Please comment on the discussion page.