Proposal talk:Agroecology
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Resolved: Added values no, yes and certified --Muralito
Resolved: Added subkey certification --Kovposch
Comments about this proposal are welcome
Values yes/no/certified
Resolved: Added values no, yes and certified --MuralitoI would add at least the three values, and which value should data consumers assume.
- default meaning should be "no". No agroecology unless explicit tagging.
- no
- yes (documented in the proposal) for places that has agroecology practices but haven't been certified
- certified (places with certified agroecology practices)
Subkey
Resolved: Added subkey certification --Kovposchand another subkey
- agroecology:certifier to indicate which entity has certified the agroecology practices.
- agroecology=yes : *=yes should only be "yes". It's generic. You should be specific eg agroecology=practiced / agroecology=de_facto / agroecology=informal , but see below.
- agroecology=certified : I suggested agroecology:certification=* so that organic=* can similarly be clarified without change, especially organic=only
- agroecology:certifier=* : It could be ideal. However, *:operator=* is already used in heritage:operator=* for the same meaning. Proposing a *:cerifier=* requires broader consideration. For the purpose here, agroecology:operator=* could be used naturally, and doesn't need to be voted through this proposal.
—— Kovposch (talk) 19:31, 31 August 2024 (UTC)