Proposal:Key:school=entrance

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Deprecate school=entrance
Proposal status: Approved (active)
Proposed by: Pietervdvn
Tagging: school=entrance
Applies to: node,way
Definition: The location where people (mostly students) can enter a school
Statistics:

Rendered as: N/A
Draft started: 2022-06-10
RFC start: 2022-06-10
Vote start: 2022-06-29
Vote end: 2022-07-13

Proposal

This proposal aims to deprecate the school=entrance

Tagging and history

school=entrance has historically been used to tag where people (probably students) can enter their school.

This tagging around 1800 objects - a number that has been stable since 2014.

Rationale

This feature should be officially marked as deprecated as:


  • Entrances are tagged with entrance=*, which is widely understood and supported. This can replace all current values, especially for nodes
  • There is no support in any editor to add those
  • There is no support in any data user
  • Usage is very small (1800 objects) compared to entrance=* which has 3.000.000 objects
  • The wiki page on school=* already stated in 2018 that entrance=* is a better alternative
  • This tags uses the key school=*, which can be used for a decent tagging scheme, e.g. for subject or school level. (This is for a future proposal)

Examples

This node is an example of how the old tagging was converted into the new tagging.

Rendering

Not applicable

Features/Pages affected

entrance=* already received a possible-synonym-box school=* already noted the deprecation

External discussions

Also see the discussion on the tagging mailing list ]

Comments

Please comment on the discussion page.

I find it problematic that deprecation notice and the description mentions entrance=students, which apparently is neither documented nor used anywhere ... so the recommendation seems misguided to me. --Push-f (talk) 21:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Oh, indeed. I quickly removed this mention; this is more of an access restriction. Should have been spotted in the RFC phase, but it slipped through Pietervdvn (talk) 22:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Voting

Voting closed

Voting on this proposal has been closed.

It was approved with 26 votes for, 3 votes against and 0 abstentions.

This was a vote on _deprecating_ school=entrance


  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Now with the mention of entrance=students removed, I approve this proposal. --Push-f (talk) 21:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. No reason to have this, it's just more work for people who actually use OSM data. --Skquinn (talk) 21:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Rskedgell (talk) 22:25, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Riiga (talk) 05:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Thibaultmol (talk) 05:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Tordanik 07:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Peter Elderson (talk) 07:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --JeroenHoek (talk) 08:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Zorglubu (talk) 10:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Famlam (talk) 11:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. though I am not sure whether vote is adding anything --Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Protoxenus (talk) 11:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Cg909 (talk) 01:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I oppose this proposal I oppose this proposal. procedural reasons, the tag is not in use and the voting is obviously only taking place because the proposer needs to prove something --SimonPoole (talk) 11:27, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --AntMadeira (talk) 12:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --LeTopographeFou (talk) 19:33, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Thetornado76 (talk) 18:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. No need when better alternatives exist. --Minecraftchest1 (talk) 03:10, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Timmy_Tesseract (talk) 11:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --快乐的老鼠宝宝 (talk) 17:28, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Gendy54 (talk) 20:02, 10 July 2022 (UTC) cleaning that feels good
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Wmorland (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I oppose this proposal I oppose this proposal. This proposal needs more research from author. This tag is often used for school gates. Even the linked example was not changed to entrance=*. The proposal should therefore give a hint to barrier=gate. The box only mentions entrance=yes and entrance=main. I suggest better description there. I am afraid of editing this by myself because there are already much votes. --Agent redd (talk) 08:10, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Fnuttens (talk) 10:57, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I oppose this proposal I oppose this proposal. Using this rational then we must change all other "feature", with an entrance, to "feature=entrance"? I.e. building=entrance. Makes no sence al all! --Reino Baptista (talk) 15:01, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --501ghost (talk) 02:46, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Luisluigi639 (talk) 04:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --DnaX (talk) 08:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)