Talk:Tag:access=customers

what about very similar access restrictions

For example "only customers and employees". I think it is OK to use access=customers in that situation Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:46, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

I agree if that is a combined parking for both groups, because it is open for everybody having a business there, and employess as well. If it is employee-only, I would tag that access=private. There are very few uses of the word employee(s) in connection with access.--Polarbear w (talk) 09:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, "employee only" is private. I just want to document using access=customers for "customers + some private use" before someone invents access=customers_but_also_private or other value that will never be supported Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:47, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Good idea :-) --Polarbear w (talk) 20:47, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Customers of what?

Is there a way to indicate what one must be a customer of? E.g., there may be multiple adjoining shops, but a parking is only for customers of a particular shop. Gpvos (talk) 17:06, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Of the object has a name or operator tag, it could be deduced by that. I don't know of a particular tag for it. Nielkrokodil (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

I added a wiki page customers=* and a reference on this page. --Nielkrokodil (talk) 17:24, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Customers of Churches/places of worship/other private institutions that don't directly charge?

I've seen people use access=destination for churches as it would be kind of wrong to pay a church (other than tithes, etc., but that's out of scope for now). Since customers tend to be paying customers, should religious elements attendees be called customers of a religion?

@Gpserror: In my mapping I used "customers" quite widely, also for parking lot for parents in a school (government-operated - so a free one). I think that such use would fine. Maybe it should be added to the page? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 06:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)