User talk:Dany111
Benvenuto ad OpenStreetMap
Ciao Dany111, benvenuto/a su OpenStreetMap!
Di seguito alcuni consigli per riuscire ad avere il massimo da OpenStreetMap:
Per iniziare la tua collaborazione, guarda come prima cosa il Portale italiano
- Ricorda di non utilizzare mappe protette da copyright come base per tracciare la mappa di OpenStreetMap
- Per meglio interagire con la comunità italiana, e soprattutto per segnalare la tua presenza, aggiungi nella tua pagina utente queste due righe:
- [[Category:Users in Italy|Dany111]]
- [[Category:Users in la_tua_città|Dany111]]
- Iscriviti alla Mailing List Italiana e controlla se altre mailing list sono di tuo interessa
- Dà un'occhiata alla Beginners Guide
- Se hai altre domande controlla prima la pagina delle FAQ o semplicemente chiedi!
Buon divertimento! --EdoM (lets talk about it) 17:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Ma figurati
Hai fatto benissimo ad inserirti ed anzi sono contentissimo che tu sia già così attivo.
Proprio domenica al Mapping Party di Perugia dicevamo che prima dell'estate sarebbero da mappare per bene un po' di località della versilia. Sei già inscritto alla Mailing List? --EdoM (lets talk about it) 09:07, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Wela
Sono già iscritto alla mailing list anche se non so quanto tempo avrò per partecipare attivamente alle discussioni :-). Diciamo che sono sempre indaffaratissimo con il lavoro e sfrutto 2 minuti di pausa merenda/spuntino, per scrivere qui (E quando stacco da lavoro, se la mia ragazza non mi reclama, vado a sperdermi con il TOMTOM da qualche parte... :P) Tra l'altro devo ancora capire bene come si usi il "Talk" :D... Non ho ben capito se devo scrivere nella tua pagina o nella mia :)
Stasera forse vado in moto in un quartiere di Viareggio e girottolo un po' per in là... --Dany111 09:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- come ben hai compreso le risposte vanno date nella pagina di discussione dell'utente a cui vuoi rispondere, non è comodo, ma MediaWiki funziona così :( --EdoM (lets talk about it) 12:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the author of image File:20feb.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-".
In case that you are the author of the photo: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step or when you are uploading files that are not your own work.
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the author of image File:A10.png ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified March 2022}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 10:39, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:Darkangel.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Dany111}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, June}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)