User talk:Mabapla
Update des Hochspannungsnetzes in Deutschland
Hallo! Du und einige andere erhalten diese Nachrticht, weil sie in der category:power user eingetragen sind.
Am 12. Februar 2010 habe ich das nebenstehende Bild (voltage-de.png) mit neuen Daten aktualisiert. In der nächsten Woche soll dann noch die Ansicht nach Betreiber (Image:Power_line-in-germany.png mit Symbolen von User:Sergionaranja) und das Bahnstromnetz (:Image:db_energie.png]] möglicherweise diesmal mit Kraftwerken) erneuert werden. Dort sind mehr Trassen als zuvor abgebildet, denn das Netz in OSM ist wieder stark gewachsen und man sieht auch die power=tower mit und ohne ref=*. Das Netz wächst auch in der Realität. Die Neubaustrecke "Weimar - Schkopau", "Genshagener Heide - Grünauer Kreuz" (Süd-Berlin) auch eine Legende werden dann in der Karte zu sehen sein.
Wer helfen möchte kann mich über den OSM-Nachrichtendienst erreichen und schreiben, wo er/sie unterwegs ist oder ob ihr ein Länderticket der Bahn habt. Dann bekommt ihr einen Auftrag in der Gegend. Gerne würde ich eine Grafik mit den Standorten fehlender Mastnummern gleich veröffentlichen. Diese Grafik würde aber zu groß für das Wiki.
Ich würde gerne eure Meinung zu dem Bild hören. Als thumb ist es nicht so geeignet und die wahre Kraft entfaltet es erst in voller Ansicht. Es wäre möglich die Schienenstrecken einzublenden. Die Dateigröße wird jedoch stark anwachsen. Ein kleineres Bildformat stört die Erkennbarkeit der Details. Bahnpirat 08:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Änderung power-tagging
Moin ... gerade entdeckt: Proposed_features/generator_rationalisation - finde ich ganz gut; Gruß, -- Schusch 12:04, 7 September 2010 (BST)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the author of image File:Anl411mast38 klein.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified January 2022}} from the file page.
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 10:35, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:Anl411wdh klein.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Mabapla}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, June}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 22:27, 18 June 2022 (UTC)