User talk:Stedewa
Bonjour à Morges de Bière. :) Marc Mongenet 21:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi - if you could clarify on Talk:Potlatch that'd be useful. --Richard 08:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Page FR:Main Page
Salut Stedewa,
je n'ai rien contre les changements dans le wiki, au contraire, mais j'avais passé beaucoup de temps à créer quelque chose d'original et surtout qui soit un vrai portail pour tout ceux qui arrivaient sur OSM et qui se plaignaient que la page d'accueil d'origine était lamentable parce qu'elle manquait de liens vers les nombreuses pages intéressantes. D'ailleurs, à l'époque, j'avais reçu de nombreux commentaires très positifs sur cette nouvelle version qui devenait un vrai portail et montrait toute la richesse du wiki.
Je vois que depuis quelques jours, tu détricotes ce que j'avais fais. Là encore, je n'ai rien contre les changements, à condition qu'ils aillent dans le sens d'une amélioration. Mais, j'ai l'impression que tu nous remets la page originale par petites touches discrètes, et là, je suis moins d'accord parce que c'est franchement une vrai régression. En passant, cette nouvelle page, je l'avais d'abord créée sur un lien à part et avait demandé l'avis des autres contributeurs avant de basculer sur la page principale. Je n'avais pas fait 20 edits espacés sur plusieurs semaines sans que l'on voit où cela nous mène. Maintenant on se retrouve avec un mélange de deux styles très différent et assez hideux. --Pieren 22:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Salut Pieren,
Pour donner réponse ici, ensuite on créera le vrai débat sur la page de discussion de la page principale francophone.
Je n'ai supprimé aucune information de la page principale et aucun lien n'a été supprimé. J'ai fait en sorte que l'actualité : réunion et image du jour soient directement visibles. Désolé pour les éditions multiples, mais les blocs que je mets à jour le sont tout de même dans un espace temps restreint. Concernant ta dernière phrase, je suis plutôt d'accord que les deux styles ne collent pas te qu'il faut améliorer, uniformiser. Mais je préfère une page principale un peu sexy, et qui ne doit pas être une page wiki comme une autre à mon avis et c'est pour cela que je me suis permis de remettre l'image de la semaine en meilleure place et actualisée et la traduction peut être faite facilement dès que qqn se rend compte que le texte ne colle plus avec l'image. Je désire que cette page soit la page d'entrée pour tout francophone arrivant sur le site, d'ailleur en effectuant des recherces sur Google, un francophone entre presque plus facilement par cette page que celle du menu "Accueil" où on se retrouve inéroxablement lors d'un surf sur le wiki, ce qui a terme devrait être changé.
Meilleures salutations --Stedewa 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:Icon openstreetday vevey.png ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Stedewa}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified March 2022}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Aerial imagery source and license
Which aerial was used on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Montage_Ortho_R-Pod.ch_flat_selection.png ? How it is licensed? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
| I've had the a CC-BY-SA-4.0-self for these images. --Stedewa (talk) 09:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
So you have taken this by your own drone? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 20:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:Osm vevey.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Stedewa}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, August}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 21:31, 5 August 2022 (UTC)