User talk:Rayquaza
| Bitte für neue Konversationen einen neuen Abschnitt eröffnen und Beiträge korrekt signieren. Bei Zuwiederhandlung wird der Beitrag ggf. kommentarlos und kostenpflichitg entfernt ;-) |
|---|
Danke
- für die Hilfe bei "meinen Rumänen" - dass Du das auch nicht blickst, tröstet mich ein wenig - irgendwie werden wir das noch richtig hinbekommen. ;-)
Nochmals Danke! Manfred
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredao (talk • contribs) 2012-06-19T15:00:16
- Kein Problem ;-) Ich verstehe, dass man das Problem wie von mir beschrieben lösen kann, meine aber, dass dies von selbst erkannt werden sollte.
- Ausserdem möchte ich dich bitten, auf Diskussionsseiten deine Beiträge zu unterschreiben, sodass dir einfacher geantwortet werden kann. Es dauerte etwa ein Achtfaches der Zeit, um herauszufinden, dass der Beitrag von dir stammt ;-) --rayquaza 14:12, 19 June 2012 (BST)
Verständnis der VwV
Guten Abend, Rayqaza,
- Es gibt nunmal "Schutzstreifen". Sie unterscheiden sich deutlich von strikten Radfahrstreifen. Sie sollen mit wenig Tagging-Aufwand unmissverständlich zu kartieren sein.
- Dein Missverständnis des VwV-Textes trägt m.E. nicht zur Frage der optimalen Kartierung bei. Darum habe ich es und die darus entstandene Diskussion aus dem Kapitel "Abstimmung" der Vorschlagsseite auf die Diskussionsseite verschoben.--Ulamm (talk) 16:21, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Noch eine lustige Box für dich
|
This user maps along railway lines and while travelling by train. For more information see OpenRailwayMap. |
|---|
{{User RailwayMapper}}. Siehe auch User:Nakaner. --Nakaner (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the author of image File:OSMTracker-icon 100x100.png ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified March 2022}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:HTC Vision.png ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Rayquaza}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, June}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)